Tag Archives: History

World War I: Logic & Folly

2019 marks the centennial of the Paris Peace Conference following the conclusion of ‘The War to End All Wars.’ This Armistice Day,  it seems appropriate to take a long look back at the war and flawed peace that set the stage for the century’s remaining conflicts. The centennial of the Great War has brought renewed interest and focus on the causes, conduct, and consequences of the First World War. The entire generation that has any memory of this great conflict has passed and gone and all that we are left with are their words and deeds that slowly fade and transform into myth. Over the past few years a number of excellent books have been published on the First World War, and here are some of our favorites:

“The key decision-makers – kings, emperors, foreign ministers, ambassadors, military commanders and a host of lesser officials – walked towards danger in watchful, calculated steps. The outbreak of war was the culmination of chains of decisions made by political actors with conscious objectives, who were capable of a degree of self-reflection, acknowledged a range of options and formed the best judgements they could on the basis of the best information they had to hand. Nationalism, armaments, alliances and finance were all part of the story, but they can be made to carry real explanatory weight only if they can be seen to have shaped the decisions that – in combination – made war break out.”

“The key decision-makers – kings, emperors, foreign ministers, ambassadors, military commanders and a host of lesser officials – walked towards danger in watchful, calculated steps. The outbreak of war was the culmination of chains of decisions made by political actors with conscious objectives, who were capable of a degree of self-reflection, acknowledged a range of options and formed the best judgements they could on the basis of the best information they had to hand. Nationalism, armaments, alliances and finance were all part of the story, but they can be made to carry real explanatory weight only if they can be seen to have shaped the decisions that – in combination – made war break out.”

Everyone should read The Guns of August by Barbara Tuchman about the decisions and chain of events that followed the assisnation of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo. I’m currently rereading it after twenty years. However, of the more recent publications Christopher Clark’s The Sleepwalkers is a great place to start. It is an extremely relevant and thought provoking analysis of the circumstances prior to the First World War, meticulous in its accumulation of information. I love the author’s introduction and approach to the topic – mainly that the figures behind the July Crisis of 1914 acted within the limits of their experiences and circumstances.

What Clark does exceptionally well is demonstrate how the threads of plans, fears, and faulty ideas in international politics of the time spliced together to absolve the decision-makers of any responsibility for the catastrophe. Russia’s contribution to the calamity is central, the Balkan focus of the Great Power politics made the system unstable and volatile, while the Triple Entente refused to allow Austria-Hungary any reasonable room to maneuver in pursuit of its national interest. The First World War came as the unlikely culmination of rigid, narrow, and faulty thinking – by many people. It’s an excellent history with an impressive amount of thoroughness. 

2 June 1915

“It is a curious thing, Field Marshall, that this war has produced no great generals” – UK Prime Minister H. H. Asquith

“No, Prime Minister, nor has it produced a statesman.’ Major General Henry Wilson, Sub Chief of Staff, British Expeditionary Force

The Great War was a tragedy of diplomacy and generalship. The Sleepwalkers addresses the former, while Allan Mallison’s book addresses the latter – albeit exclusively on the British side. While he touches on the relationship between the British government and its generals Mallison savages the military men that favored seniority over brilliance, petty jealousy over competence, and the bayonet over the bullet.

He doesn’t write alternative histories,  but he does wonder out loud the direction a few different decisions would have taken the war. Chief among them is the decision to use the entire army in France rather than use the small force to train the millions they would eventually need.  Or the shortsighted decision to empty staff officers from army headquarters to fill the British Expeditionary Force, leaving the desks left for developing strategy of a world war empty. 

Too Important for the Generals asks the same questions that need asking as contemporary wars languish adrift from policy, rotating generals re-declare victory, and the world waits for this generations’ great statesmen.

“While it is obvious that none of the post-war violence can be explained without reference to the Great War, it might be more appropriate to view that conflict as the unintentional enabler of the social or national revolutions that were to shape Europe’s political, social and cultural agenda for decades to come. . . It was in this period that a particular deadly but ultimately conventional conflict between states – the First World War – gave way to an interconnected series of conflicts whose logic and purpose was much more dangerous.” 

History is written by the victors . . . or so they say. However, what Robert Gerwarth does is flip that idea and explains how the inability to justify death, destruction, and sacrifice with victory shaped the “post-Great War” years of the defeated states. Without a victory to lean on, the defeated Central Powers redefined the logic of violence against civilians and the dehumanization of “enemies,” the belief in betrayal by fifth columns, and the rediscovery that violence and the threat of violence can bring political change for political minorities – see Fascists and Bolsheviks. Further exasperated by the collapse of the polyglot empires, national minorities fought to attain statehood and security in an undefined new world order – conflicts that would carve and recarve states over the following decades. It’s a tremendously well-researched book, engaging, and an important perspective on early Twentieth Century history – which I hope can influence both the waging of war and the making of peace in the Twenty First Century.

Andrew Zapf is a co-founder of Pushing Horizons.

Disclaimer: All views expressed are that of the author.  

The Classical Age

The Classical Age is usually defined as the era between 8th Century B.C. and 6th Century A.D. The Mediterranean, known then as the inner sea, and the people who lived on its shores, serves as the fulcrum for the study of this time period. The Phoenicians, Persians, Etruscans, Gauls, Celts, Goths and others play critical roles but it is the Greek and Roman civilizations which dominate. For the purpose of this post I consider the age to have begun with the origin of the Greek myths and to have ended with the fall of Constantinople in 1453, since it marked the final end of the Byzantine Empire, the last remnants of the Romans, and an interesting fusion of Roman and Greek culture.

For centuries, the West has been enamored with Ancient Greece and Rome, and I confess to being similarly fascinated.  Not only did the political philosophies of that time and place form the inspiration of our current republic, but it is a time in history (a term itself derived from the ancient Herodotus) in which the actions of men rise out of the mists of myth and legend.  Zeus, Athena, and the other gods are joined by Achilles and Hector of Homer’s Iliad, and later by the Persians, Spartans, Legionnaires, power mad Roman Emperors and stoic philosophers.  However, fundamentally, I find immersing myself in the world of the ancients as a means to study the human condition absent the prejudice and immediacy of the present.  The below is a small sample to begin that journey.

Alexander the Great by Robert Lane Fox

No man, and only one hero, had been called invincible before him, and then only by a poet”

Few, if any, of the Ancients had such a powerful draw in their own era as Alexander the Great. Dead by the age of 32, he had already conquered the known world, reaching at his furthest, deep into India. Julius Caesar is said to have cried at a monument to Alexander for not yet having accomplished as much at the same age. Robert Lane Fox’s book does an incredible job explaining all the complexity and contradictions of Alexander. The relationship between Alexander and his great father Philip of Macedon (whose murder remains a mystery till today). Fox captures Alexander’s physical courage and strategic vision, his apparent desire for cultural fusion with the people he conquered, as well as his rages and his drinking bouts. Parsing through the limited original scholarship from the era and combining it with modern archaeological discoveries, Fox captures the essence of the man without losing the romance which draws one to the story of Alexander all these years later.

Rubicon: The Last Years of the Roman Republic by Tom Holland

” To the cheers and boos of spectators, charioteer and nobleman alike would make their drive for glory, knowing that the risk of failure was precisely what gave value to success.”

Senātus Populusque Rōmānus (SPQR), the Senate and People of Rome-this clarion call still rings today. The symbol of Rome’s greatness is displayed on every manhole cover in modern Rome and on many a tattooed arm of American soldiers in our most recent wars. It, like all slogans, means many things to many people. However, at its core, it is a compact between the citizens of Rome and the city’s political elites. It is a hint that in spite of Rome’s long reign as an Empire with Emperors it rose to glory first as a republic.

How then did the Roman Republic end? The HBO series Rome is an excellent dramatization of the destructive civil war between Julius Caesar and Pompey that led to the end of the Republic. Tom Holland takes a slightly different take in his excellent and accessible book. He describes the increasingly fierce competition between Roman elites for political power in the years before the Civil War. In addition, one gets a sense of the growing income inequality – fueled paradoxically by Rome’s military conquests and the explosion of a slave based economy – and the subsequent popular mobilization of the underclass to redress such inequality. Legal machinations and back room deals are used to thwart reforms and ultimately lead to war. Of all the great histories of the Classical age I have read, this is the most timely, compact, and dramatic rendering of a civilization disturbingly close to our own.

The History of the Byzantine Empire: From its Glory to its Downfall by Charles Oman

“When a State contains masses of men who devote their whole energies to a repulsively selfish attempt to save their own individual souls, while letting the world around them slide on as best it may, then the body politic is diseased.”

I have repeatedly been drawn to histories written in the last century of even earlier ancient times; thanks -in part-to the easy availability of older historical narratives as e-books online.  As I read and have begun to write history myself, I have found that modern historians, especially popular ones, rarely have different primary sources but do write with the burden of seeing the world through our modern lens and prejudice.  I am not immune to seeing dangerous parallels between our times and, for example, the decline of the Roman Republic (see above). However, it is useful to remember that English historians writing in the late nineteenth century-arguably the height of British power-also saw parallels between ancient calamity and a possible future for their society.

One day, in the course of my life, I will complete the multi-year epic that is Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.  In the meantime, I continue to seek out other, more manageable, works on the Roman Empire, Medieval ages, etc. A great example of which is The History of the Byzantine Empire by Charles Oman.  Oman was a lecturer at Oxford University in the late nineteen hundreds.  However, this work is no dry old academic text. In this book published in 1892, he colorfully tells the story of the Byzantine Empire from the decision of the Roman Emperor Constantine to make the city on the Bosphorus his capital, then called Constantinople, to the final collapse of his Greek Successors overrun by the Ottoman Forces of Mehmet the Second in 1453.  With always interesting, and occasionally biting commentary, he describes the rise of the Eastern Roman Empire, its gradual adoption of Greek vice Latin culture, its increasing reliance on foreign mercenaries, its inexorable slow decline hastened by marauding Western European crusaders, and its final collapse at the hands of a new, more dynamic and combative force.

Roland Minez is a co-founder of Pushing Horizons.

Disclaimer: All views expressed are that of the author.